Showing posts with label Citing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Citing. Show all posts

20080626

Computer-Generated Bibliographic Citations: Can Machines Get It Right?


For decades we have been trying to get computers to correctly format bibliographic citations. Can machines get it right? Some programming is now doing a good job, but any machine-generated citation should be checked for accuracy, as tweaking is sometimes required.

Computer-Generated Bibliographic Citations is a brief tutorial (PDF format, 130KB, 13 slides) which covers why citation is important, compares formatting in a few bibliographic styles (APA, MLA, CHICAGO, CSE, NLM, AFS), lists a few programs which generate citations, and compares machine-generated citation accuracy for APA citations generated by WorldCat and Zotero.

20071015

NLM Adds "Citing Medicine" to NCBI Bookshelf


In the 21st century, technological advances have created a whole new world of medical citations. To give authors, editors, medical librarians and others a guidebook for navigating that world, the National Library of Medicine is pleased to announce the publication of Citing Medicine: the NLM Style Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers, available free of charge on the NCBI Bookshelf.

Citing Medicine provides guidance for citing 26 types of published and unpublished material, ranging from print books and journal articles to blogs and wikis.

--from the NLM announcement of the 2nd edition, 2007.

20070730

New Study on Student Internet Citation Confirms Link Rot


I have just read an interesting article: HOVDE, K. (2007). You Can't Get There from Here: Student Citations in an Ephemeral Electronic Environment. College & Research Libraries. 68, 312-321.

The article is available in print, but is not available on the surface Web, or in our Library databases. As of today, the July 2007 issue of College & Research Libraries has not been indexed by our Library databases. But, as I say, the article is available in print, in the periodical room of the library. Think of all you miss (or have to wait for), if you just rely on Web-based information. Now, to the article.

Hovde did a study of 1,666 student citations to "Internet resources" from 529 freshman English composition papers. For a 1999 sample, seven months after submission of the papers only 38% of the links led to the document cited. For a 2004 sample only 45% of the links accessed the document. Seven years after the 1999 citations were submitted only 9% of the links were successful. Hovde writes: "...the Web is an unstable medium. The sine qua non of a paper's references is stability."

As such the surface Web is subverting the scholarly enterprise which depends upon providing proof of authority, and a "published trail of evidence" which can be verified.

Heaven help us if students start citing fluff from the blogosphere... or MySpace!

20070727

References for College Papers


References for College Papers is Steven Dutch's overview of what is and what is not acceptable to reference in college-level writing in his geology classes at the University of Wisconsin (for example, when "The Internet" is and is not an acceptable source).
How to let your Professors Know you are Familiar with College Writing
  • Start early to locate sources.

  • Cite scholarly references only.

  • Cite recent materials.

  • Use accepted referencing styles.